Hallazgos epistemológicos en la investigación en gestión aplicando la crítica inmanente, desde el humanismo al currículo humanista
Epistemological findings in management research applying immanient critique, from humanism to the humanistic curriculum
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Problemática: las perspectivas epistemológicas de la investigación en gestión, al igual que las de cualquier disciplina, deben revisarse constantemente para identificar oportunidades de avance teórico. La mayoría de las escuelas de gestión en Latinoamérica se suscriben a la corriente de la gestión humanista. La administración de operaciones, siendo un componente del currículo, se origina en una corriente epistemológica diferente. El punto de partida de este artículo es la tensión entre las dos corrientes epistemológicas. Objetivos: confrontar las perspectivas epistemológicas de la investigación en gestión existentes en el currículo de gestión humanista desde sus propios principios y, a partir de esa confrontación, proponer nuevas perspectivas epistemológicas. Materiales y métodos: se usa la exégesis textual para la recolección de la información. También se usa la dialéctica hegeliana, mediante el método de la crítica inmanente, para construir sobre tesis, antítesis y síntesis. Resultados: el artículo encuentra posibles perspectivas epistemológicas de la investigación en gestión y las presenta en lo ontológico, epistemológico y metodológico. Encuentra oportunidades con respecto a lo ontológico en los estudios del proceso y la teoría de sistemas. En cuanto a lo epistemológico, en la historia, la multidisciplinariedad, la territorialidad y la cibernética. En lo metodológico, en los estudios multidisciplinares, los métodos de la filosofía y el panexperiencialismo. Discusión: el artículo aborda la discusión del significado de un estudio humanista y de las humanidades en la investigación en gestión. Conclusiones: existe la necesidad de explorar nuevas posiciones filosóficas en la investigación en gestión desde las definiciones iniciales. Contribución / originalidad: el estudio discute una de las vertientes más relevantes en la epistemología de la investigación en gestión en Latinoamérica.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Palabras clave:
epistemology
humanism; management
ontology
process
M19 Business Administration
B15 History of Economic Thought through 1925: Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary
B25 History of Economic Thought since 1925: Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Austrian; Stockholm School
administración
epistemología
gestión
humanismo
ontología
proceso
M19 Administración de empresas
B15 Historia del pensamiento económico hasta 1925: histórico; institucional; evolutivo
B25 Historia del pensamiento económico desde 1925: histórico; institucional; evolutivo; austriaco; Escuela de Estocolmo.
Referencias
Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151897
Aktouf, O. (2002). El Simbolismo y la “Cultura Organizacional” De los abusos conceptuales a las lecciones de campo. AD-minister, (1), 63-93. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7024461
Aktouf, O. & Holford, W. (2009). The implications of humanism for business studies. En H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan & E. Von Kimakowitz (Eds.), Humanism in Business (pp. 101-122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808395.008
Aktouf, O., Chenoufi, M. & Holford, W. (2005). The False Expectations of Michael Porter's Strategic Management Framework. Problems and Perspectives in Management 3(4), 181-200. https://acortar.link/WkiX7N
Allen, M. R. D. (2019). God, Ontology and Management: A Philosophical Praxis. Philosophy of Management 18(3), 303-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-018-0101-6
Antonio, R. J. (1981). Immanent Critique as the Core of Critical Theory: Its Origins and Developments in Hegel, Marx and Contemporary Thought. The British Journal of Sociology, 32(3), 330-345. https://doi.org/10.2307/589281
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization (Vol. 1). University of Minnesota Press. https://acortar.link/ThZL3D
Arciniega García, L. (2019). Humanismo y Germanías: la decoración del palacio condal de Oliva11. Hispanic Research Journal, 20(5), 451-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682737.2019.1734341
Arnould, E. J. & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868-882. https://doi.org/10.1086/426626
Audi, R. (1999). Diccionario Akal de Filosofía. Cambridge University Press.
Beer, S. (1984). The Viable System Model: Its Provenance, Development, Methodology and Pathology. J Oper Res Soc, 35(1), 7–25 https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1984.2
Barnard, C. I. (1968). The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press. https://bit.ly/3toWxPm
Booth, C. & Rowlinson, M. (2006). Management and organizational history: Prospects. Management & Organizational History, 1(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935906060627
Brockmeyer, E., Halstrøm, H., Jensen, A. & Erlang, A. (1948). The Life and Works of A.K. Erlang. University of Michigan.
Brunet, M., Fachin, F. & Langley, A. (2021). Studying Projects Processually. International Journal of Project Management, 39(8), 834-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.10.006.
Burrell, G. & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Heinemann Educational Books. https://acortar.link/sApQdy
Chanlat, A. & Bedard, R. (1991). Managing in the Quebec style: originality and vulnerability. International Studies of Management & Organization, 21(3), 10-37.
Chanlat, A. & Soto, B. M. (1996 ). El oficio del dirigente: ¿“gran empresario” o “buen dirigente”? Cuadernos de Administración, 15(23), 111-118.
Cook, A., Blom, H., Lillo, F., Nunzio, R., Miccichè, S., Rivas, D., Vázquez, R. & Zanin, M. (2015). Applying complexity science to air traffic management. Journal of Air Transport Management, 42, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.09.011
Dantzig, G. (1982). Reminiscences about the origins of linear programming. Operations Research Letters, 1(2), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6377(82)90043-8
De Courcelles, D. (2019). La divulgación humanista de los saberes: lo que el viento se llevó. Desde Pedro Mexía a Michel de Montaigne en la Europa del siglo XVI. Hipogrifo, 7(2), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.13035/H.2019.07.02.30
Desmond, M. (2012). On Not knowing Greek: Leonzio Pilatus's Rendition of the Iliad and the Translatio of Mediterranean Identities. En E. Campbell & R. Mills (Eds.), Rethinking Medieval Translation: Ethics, Politics, Theory (pp. 21-40). Boydell and Brewer.
Durant, W. (1953). The Renaissance. The Story of Civilization: Part V. Simon & Schuster.
Durugbo, C. M., Anouze, A. L., Amoudi, O. & Al-Balushi, Z. (2021). Competitive priorities for regional operations: a Delphi study. Production Planning & Control, 32(15), 1295-1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1805809
Dussel, E. (2013). Filosofía de la liberación – Obras selectas XI – (1.a ed.). Docencia. https://www.enriquedussel.com/txt/Textos_Obras_Selectas/(F)11.Fillosofia_liberacion.pdf
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., Jackson, P. & Jaspersen, L. J. (2018). Management & Business Research (6.a ed.). SAGE.
Eriksson, D. & Engström, A. (2021). Using critical realism and abduction to navigate theory and data in operations and supply chain management research. Supply Chain Management, 26(2), 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2020-0091
Erlang, A. (1909). The Theory of Probabilities and Telephone Conversations. Nyt. Tidsskr. Mat. Ser. B, 20, 33-39. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3M9HQYS
Fayol, H., Coubrough, J. A. & International Management Institute. (1930). Industrial and General Administration. Translated by J.A. Coubrough. Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons.
Follet, M. P. (1918). The New State. University Park: Penn State Press.
Frosh, S. & Emerson, P. D. (2005). Interpretation and over-interpretation: disputing the meaning of texts. Qualitative Research, 5(3), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105054457
Garud, R., Jarzabkowski, P., Langley, A., Tsoukas, H., Van de Ven, A. & Lê, J. (2020). "Process Research Methods: A Conversation among Leading Scholars*". En Crook, T.R., Lê, J. & Smith, A.D. (Eds.), Advancing Methodological Thought and Practice (vol. 12, pp. 117-132). Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-838720200000012019
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
Geraldi, J., Maylor, H. & Williams, T. (2011). Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31(9), 966-990. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111165848
Gilbreth, F. & Gilbreth, L. M. (1917). Applied motion study a collection of papers on the efficient method to industrial preparedness. Sturgis & Walton Company.
Gilbreth, F. B. (1909). Bricklaying system. The MC Clark Publishing Company.
Gilbreth, F. B. & Kent, R. T. (1911). Motion study: a method for increasing the efficiency of the workman. D. Van Nostrand Company.
Gonzáles-Miranda, D. R. & Rojas-Rojas, W. (2020). Editorial. Repensando la crítica en los estudios organizacionales. Innovar, 30(78), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n78.90295
Grassl, W. & Habisch, A. (2011). Ethics and economics: Towards a New Humanistic Synthesis for Business. J Bus Ethics, 99(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0747-7
Havu, K. (2019). Ethos, authority and worldly reputation in the Erasmian Republic of Letters. Renaissance Studies, 33(5), 789-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/rest.12543
Hegel, G. W. F. (2014). Science of logic. Routledge.
Holmström, J., Hameri, A.-P. & Ketokivi, M. (2006). Operations management as a problem-solving discipline. Proceedings, B1-B6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2006.27175141
https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/articles-85932_archivo_pdf.pdf
International Federation of Operational Research Societies. (2020, 12 de abril). What is OR. https://www.ifors.org/what-is-or/
International Humanistic Management Association. (2020, 12 de noviembre). Art for Humanizing Management Seminar with Dr. Jyoti Bachani [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFxtdb-iEGE&t=2131s
Jackson, T. (2002). Reframing human resource management in Africa: A cross-cultural perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(7), 998-1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190210131267
Kast, F. E. & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1972). General Systems Theory: Applications for Organization and Management. AMJ, 15(4), 447-465. https://doi.org/10.5465/255141
Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
Lee, S., Lovelace, K. & Manz, C. (2014). Serving with spirit: An integrative model of workplace spirituality within service organizations. Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 11(1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2013.801023
Lobato Calleros, O., Chanlat, A., Bédard, R. & Ramírez, G. (2014). Autopietic decisions approach: a governance research network case study. The TQM Journal, 26(4), 382-394. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2014-0011
Luhmann, N. (2017). Evolution of science. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201752240
Markov, A. (1971). Extension of the limit theorems of probability theory to a sum of variables connected in a chain. John Wiley and Sons.
Marsh, D. (2013). Cicero in the Renaissance. En Steel, C. (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero (pp. 306 - 317). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139048750.020
Mayo, E. (1934). The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. Nature, 134, 201. https://www.nature.com/articles/134201b0
Melé, D. (2003a). The Challenge of Humanistic Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023298710412
Melé, D. (2003b). Organizational Humanizing Cultures: Do They Generate Social Capital? Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1/2), 3-14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25075051
Meredith, J.R., Raturi, A., Amoako-Gyampah, K. & Kaplan, B. (1989). Alternative research paradigms in operations. Journal of Operations Management, 8(4), 297-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(89)90033-8
Ministerio de Educación. (2003, 13 de noviembre). Resolución número 2767 de 2003. Por la cual se definen las características específicas de calidad para los programas de pregrado en Administración.
Monreal Pérez, J. L. (2011). Juan Luis Vives, lengua y lenguaje en el humanismo renacentista. Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía, 28, 101-133. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev-ASHF.2011.v28.36281
Montaño Hirose, L. (2020). Encrucijadas y desafíos de los Estudios Organizacionales Una reflexión desde las perspectivas institucionales. Innovar, 30(78), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n78.90304
Münsterberg, H. (1913). Psychologie und Wirtschaftsleben. The Riverside Cambridge.
Nadworny, M. (1957). Frederick Taylor and Frank Gilbreth: Competition in Scientific Management. Business History Review, 31(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3111727
Osejo-Bucheli , C. (2021b). Hacia una filosofía de la administración centrada en el carácter. Revista de Filosofía, Centro de Estudios Filosóficos "Dr. Adolfo García Díaz", facultad de Humanidades y Educación, Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo – Venezuela, 38(98), 715-743. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5528973
Osejo-Bucheli, C. (2021a). Demostración lógica sobre coherencia de filosofía de la ciencia y métodos cualitativos de investigaciónen gestión. Revista Educación En Ingeniería, 16(32), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.26507/rei.v16n32.1191
Osejo-Bucheli, C. (2022a). Globalization fractal effect: theory testing through macro-ethnographic observation of deterritorialization in Colombian social uprisings [working paper].
Osejo-Bucheli, C. (2022b). Theory evaluation and formulation: a reply to Ludic Theory through A.N.Whitehead´s Aesthetic Experience. Philosophy of Management, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-022-00194-4
Parello, V. (2008). The anti-Jewish apologetics of Juan Luis Vives (1543). Between faith and reason. Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez, 38(2), 171-187+322+318+314. https://doi.org/10.4000/mcv.3959
Pareto, V. (1916). Trattato di sociologia generale (vol. 1). Firenze: G. Barbera, Editore. https://archive.org/details/ParetoTrattatoDiSociologiaGeneraleVol1/mode/2up
Pascal, B. (1852). pensées. Dezobry et E. Magdeleine.
Pirson, M. & Lawrence, P. R. (2010). Humanism in Business - Towards a Paradigm Shift? J Bus Ethics, 93, 553-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0239-1
Pirson, M. & Malhotra, D. (2011). Foundations of Organizational Trust: What Matters to Different Stakeholders? Organization Science, 22(4), 1087-1104. https://doi.org/10.2307/20868912
Pirson, M., Bachani, J. & Blomme, R. J. (2018). Humanistic Management: Social Entrepreneurship and Mindfulness, Volume II: Foundations, Cases, and Exercises. Business Expert Press. https://digitalcommons.stmarys-ca.edu/school-economics-business-faculty-works/484/
Prat, S. (2017). La réception des Académiques dans les Essais: une manière voisine et inavouée de faire usage du doute sceptique. En: Smith, P. & Charles S. (Eds.), Academic Scepticism in the Development of Early Modern Philosophy. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées (vol 221). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45424-5_2
Prelinger Archives. (2021, 06 de marzo). Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/prelinger
Reed, M. (2006). Organizational Theorizing: A Historically Contested Terrain. En S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy & T. B. Lawrence, The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 19-54). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608030.n2
Rogers, C. R. (1942). Counseling and psychotherapy; newer concepts in practice. Houghton Mifflin.
Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., & Wilson, J. (2012). Business research methods. Financial Times (6.a ed.). FT Prentice Hall.
Savitski, S. (2019). Idleness and freedom in Michel de Montaigne’s “essays”. Philosophical Literary Journal Logos, 29(1), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2019-1-189-200
Shewhart, W. (1931). Economic control of quality of manufactured product. Van Nostrand.
Smith, J. H. (1998 ). The Enduring Legacy of Elton Mayo. Human Relations, 51(3), 221-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679805100302
Spitzeck, H., Pirson, M., Amann, W. Khan, S., von Kimakowitz, E. (Eds.) (2009). Humanism in business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steinberg, J. (2020). Politics as a model of pedagogy in Spinoza. Ethics and Education, 15(2), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2020.1731657
Steiner, G. (2013, 22 de febrero). Universitas? [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyAqh4-18nQ
Swann, T. & Stoborod, K. (2014). Did you hear the one about the anarchist manager? Ephimera, 14(4), 591-609. https://bit.ly/3hvGlpN
Swann, T. R. (2016). Anarchist Cybernetics: Control and Communication in Radical Left Social Movements (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester).
Swann, T. (2017). Information, cybernetics and the second industrial revolution. Ephemera, 17(2), 457. https://bit.ly/35p6vIv
Swann, T. (2018). Towards an anarchist cybernetics: Stafford Beer, self-organisation and radical social movements. Ephemeta Theory & Politics in Organization, 18(3), 427-456. https://bit.ly/3tqwHKG
Swann, T. (2020). Anarchist Cybernetics: Control and Communication in Radical Politics. Policy Press.
Taylor, F. W. (1903). Shop management, by Frederick Winslow Taylor, with an introduction by Henry R. Towne. Harper & Brothers Publishers. http://www.public-library.uk/pdfs/8/290.pdf
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper & Brothers Publishers.
Taylor, F. & Fayol, H. (1981). Principios de la administración científica. Ateneo. https://bit.ly/3Mgzsqr
Tead, O. (1929). Human Nature and Management: The applications of Psychology to Executive Leadership. McGraw Hill. https://bit.ly/3Hznchu
Towill, D. R. (2010). Industrial engineering the Toyota Production System. Journal of Management History, 16(3), 327-345. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511341011051234
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1985). 11. Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science. En Churchland, P. M. & Hooker, C. A., Images of science: Essays on realism and empiricism, with a reply from Bas C. van Fraassen. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://acortar.link/ve54Cv
Varela, E. (2018). La Hegemonía del Management. Una genealogía del poder managerial. Ediciones Universidad Simón Bolivar.
Vives, J. L. (1525). Introductio ad sapientiam (introducción a la sabiduría). Lovaina.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1972). The History and Status of General Systems Theory. AMJ, 15(4), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.5465/255139
Whitehead, A. N. (1919). The Concept of Nature. The Tarner Lectures Delivered in Trinity College November 1919. Dover Publications, INC. https://acortar.link/NeSnqr
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality, an essay in cosmology. The Free Press.
Whitehead, T. N. (1938). The Industrial Worker: A Statistical Study of Human Relations in a Group of Manual Workers, Volume II. Harvard University Press.
Whitehead, T. N. (2013). Leadership in a free society: A Study in Human Relations Based on an Analysis of Present-Day Industrial Civilization. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674593725